The Ark of the Covenant does exist! As per the CIA’s findings.
The CIA asserted the existence of the Ark of the Covenant through a remote viewing session conducted on December 5, 1988. During this session, remote viewer #32 unwittingly targeted the Ark. It described it as a container made of wood, gold, and silver, resembling a coffin and adorned with seraphim.
This document, which was declassified on August 8, 2000, has recently got widespread attention on social media.
But what exactly is the Ark of the Covenant?
According to Wikipedia, “The Ark of the Covenant, also known as the Ark of the Testimony or the Ark of God, is a purported religious storage chest and relic held to be the most sacred object by the Israelites.”
However, the remote viewer reported that the Ark is located in a secret underground site in the Middle East. Which is characterized by a dark and wet environment. Surrounded by structures reminiscent of mosque domes, the area was described as inhabited by Arabic-speaking men in white garments.
The viewer conveyed that the Ark is not merely an object but serves a spiritual purpose. It is aimed at bringing people together and playing a role in ceremonies tied to memory and resurrection.
Central to the viewer’s description is the claim that the Ark is guarded by entities possessing an unknown power. It suggests that only those authorized could access it. Any unauthorized attempts to open the container would involve unknown harmful forces protecting it.
Retired US Army Chief Thinks Using Remote Sensing For The Ark of the Covenant Is Waste Of Time
He critiqued the validity of the exercise. According to McMoneagle, using remote viewing to locate historical artifacts, such as the Ark, is fundamentally flawed due to the absence of tangible ground truth. McMoneagle firmly stated that the effectiveness of remote viewing diminishes significantly.
Especially when it is applied to targets that cannot be verified or substantiated in reality. And same is the case with legendary objects like the Ark of the Covenant.
“Using remote viewing against any target for which ground truth does not exist or is impossible to obtain, such as UFOs, UAPs, the surface of Mars, or the locations of historical relics, is a waste of time and resources,” McGoneagle said as per The NY Post.
“If someone claims that remote viewing proves the existence of something, such as the Ark of the Covenant, they must produce the Ark to substantiate their claim,” he added.
He firmly declared that without the ability to produce the Ark or any substantial proof based on the information provided during the remote viewing, the entire exercise remains speculative and serves little purpose.
