What Is Two-Point Conversion Success Rate In NFL? A Look At The History And Strategy

Football fans know the NFL playoffs are packed with heart-pounding moments, and one decision always adds intrigue: what to do after scoring a touchdown. Should a team kick for one point or go for two? The choice can swing games and spark heated debates.

Let’s dive into the history, numbers, and strategy behind the two-point conversion.

What Is A Two-Point Conversion?

A two-point conversion is a post-touchdown play where a team skips the kick and attempts to score from the opponent’s 2-yard line. If successful, they earn two points, making their touchdown worth eight instead of seven. The play requires advancing the ball into the end zone, much like scoring a regular touchdown, but with higher stakes.

How The NFL Changed The Rules In 2014

Introduced in 1994, the two-point conversion initially sparked interest but quickly faded as teams stuck with safer extra-point kicks. However, the NFL shook things up in 2014 when it tested moving extra-point kicks back 13 yards to the 15-yard line during preseason games.

By 2015, the rule was officially adopted, making kicks more challenging and adding excitement to the game. Former Houston Texans general manager and NFL Competition Committee member Rick Smith explained the reasoning: “We tried to add some skill to the play by moving it back and incentivize teams to go for two. It also gave defenses a chance to score.”

Two-Point Conversion Success Rates

Since the rule change, teams have been more willing to attempt two-point conversions, which succeed about 47.5% of the time. That’s roughly half the success rate of extra-point kicks, which stand at 95%.

Historically, coaches were cautious about taking the risk, but recent seasons have shown a shift. Fans witnessed strategic two-point attempts, like Week 17’s showdown between the Lions and Cowboys, featuring three consecutive tries in the final seconds. These moments highlight how critical- and thrilling- the decision can be.

It’s natural to wonder if the NFL based the 2014 rule change on math, but the league focused on entertainment value. Moving the extra-point kick further incentivizes teams to consider the two-point play, adding drama to the game.

Logically, proximity to the goal line influences the decision. Closer kicks favor the one-point option, while farther kicks push teams toward the two-point attempt. Yet, the strategy goes beyond simple distance calculations, requiring coaches to weigh game context, risk, and reward.

When To Go For Two: Strategic Scenarios

The decision to go for two often hinges on game circumstances and mathematical analysis. If a team trails by 5 points after scoring a touchdown, attempting a two-point conversion makes sense. Success reduces the deficit to a manageable field goal. A missed kick, however, leaves the team down by 4 or 5 points, which doesn’t improve their position.

The strategy gets trickier when trailing by 4 points. According to FiveThirtyEight, teams are more likely to attempt two-point plays late in games, especially when a single score can significantly alter the outcome.

Has Math Influenced Coaching Decisions?

Statistical insights have nudged teams toward smarter decision-making. Between 2010 and 2013, teams in a 5-point deficit situation attempted two-point conversions just 25% of the time. In the last three seasons, that number has more than doubled, reaching 56%.

Coaches increasingly rely on analytics to dictate strategy, aligning decisions with probabilities. Fans have noticed the shift, adding another layer of excitement to every touchdown.

The two-point conversion is no longer just a backup plan; it’s a calculated move that can define games. Thanks to the NFL’s 2014 rule changes and the growing influence of analytics, teams are rethinking old habits and embracing high-risk, high-reward plays. As the playoffs approach, expect more thrilling moments as coaches gamble on the numbers and chase glory.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *