A viral social media post has made Young Thug uncomfortable.
Recently, Daily Noud, a parody X account closely resembling Daily Loud, posted an absurd tweet, and Thug couldn’t keep calm.
In the post, the parody account took a dig at Young Thug’s image from a couple of years back. In the viral image, he was visibly overweight during a court trial. While the actual post was about a puffer fish inflating itself three times its size, it has Thug’s photo next to it.
“RAP FACT: The pufferfish can inflate up to roughly three times its normal size for self-defense,” the caption read.
However, it caught the rapper’s attention and he retweeted while questioning what is he doing next to a puffer fish.
“Wtf this gotta do with me?” he wrote.
Well, his disgust is understandable, as Thug did not do anything to be compared to a pufferfish. Not recently, at least.
Although, the image seemed to be from the year 2022 when his weight gained triggered a lively conversation among social media fans.
Young Thug’s Probation Is In Jeopardy Over His Social Media Post
Recently, Atlanta prosecutors have initiated proceedings to revoke the probation of the rapper following a social media controversy.
Fulton County prosecutors are seeking to revoke Thug’s probation based on a social media post he shared on X. The motion, filed on April 2, alleges that Thug reposted a photo of a police investigator involved in a gang-related murder case.
“Biggest liar in the DA office,” Thug captioned the now-deleted post.
This action is said to violate a court order against revealing the witness’s identity during their testimony, as the judge had prohibited showing the witness on social media or TV.
Prosecutors argue that Thug’s reposting of the photo constitutes participation in a “campaign of intimidation, harassment, and misinformation designed to undermine the legal process.” They also note that following his post, both the investigator and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis received threats in the comments.
In response, Thug’s attorneys, Brian Steel and Keith Adams, contend that their client did not violate the terms of his probation. He asserted that the threats made in the comments cannot be attributed to him.
